<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image Organization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digifoo.com/archives/2005/08/26/image-organization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digifoo.com/archives/2005/08/26/image-organization/</link>
	<description>blog on web foo, art foo, and other digital foo by Jessica Ledbetter</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.digifoo.com/archives/2005/08/26/image-organization/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digifoo.com/archives/2005/08/26/image-organization/#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Matt, 
That's an excellent idea. Good thing about that is one could link up pieces of the puzzle that ended up being in the final project. A montage of 5 images wouldn't need all 5 images recopied into that project directory (like it is done now at work so there are many duplicates across the whole server), but linked instead.

Jessica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt,<br />
That&#8217;s an excellent idea. Good thing about that is one could link up pieces of the puzzle that ended up being in the final project. A montage of 5 images wouldn&#8217;t need all 5 images recopied into that project directory (like it is done now at work so there are many duplicates across the whole server), but linked instead.</p>
<p>Jessica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cornell</title>
		<link>http://www.digifoo.com/archives/2005/08/26/image-organization/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Cornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digifoo.com/archives/2005/08/26/image-organization/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Thanks for identifying the problem and how you worked it. I happen to think a linked approach is best for managing content, including pictures. I talk about it at http://ideamatt.blogspot.com/2005/04/photo-blogs-wikis-and-memories-for.html, but basically the idea is that an application should support semantic annotations on content, and I propose this be done via WikiWords.

matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for identifying the problem and how you worked it. I happen to think a linked approach is best for managing content, including pictures. I talk about it at <a href="http://ideamatt.blogspot.com/2005/04/photo-blogs-wikis-and-memories-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://ideamatt.blogspot.com/2005/04/photo-blogs-wikis-and-memories-for.html</a>, but basically the idea is that an application should support semantic annotations on content, and I propose this be done via WikiWords.</p>
<p>matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.163 seconds -->
